Profile: kathcas79

Discussions

• Interesting historical specimen

  Posted in AOR0000aql February 1, 2017 3:19 PM

• Barcode mismatch

  Posted in AOR0000bbg September 20, 2016 12:06 AM

• Unknown species

  Posted in AOR0000ara September 20, 2016 12:00 AM

• Greater butterfly orchids

  Posted in The Objects July 27, 2016 12:39 PM

• Site is not working

  Posted in AOR00001kj March 1, 2016 12:25 PM

• in bud

  Posted in AOR0000cdr February 24, 2016 5:15 PM

• in bud

  Posted in AOR0000cdr February 24, 2016 4:40 PM

• would not let me change the name

  Posted in AOR00002cc February 22, 2016 9:27 PM

• can't edit

  Posted in AOR000098b February 22, 2016 9:23 PM

• gwynnie

  Posted in AOR0000ccd February 17, 2016 4:39 PM

• Orchid classification

  Posted in AOR0000ay1 February 17, 2016 3:56 PM

• Our database species names different from herbarium label names

  Posted in AOR00008tx February 17, 2016 2:03 PM

• Trouble with drawing the rectangle over the hand written label

  Posted in The Objects February 17, 2016 12:15 PM

• Trouble with drawing the rectangle over the hand written label

  Posted in The Objects February 17, 2016 12:09 PM

• Web Links

  Posted in The Objects November 23, 2015 4:45 PM

Subject comments (416)

• 

  Agree these specimens have been very well preserved!

  February 14, 2017 4:17 PM
• 

  Yes, all have been determined Gymnadenia borealis and were collected from the same locality

  February 14, 2017 4:16 PM
• 

  Thanks, likely placed as protection when the specimen was originally mounted!

  February 14, 2017 4:14 PM
• 

  Colour tends to fade in dried specimens, seems particularly true for our British orchids, nice when colour preserved as in this1847 specimen

  February 14, 2017 4:12 PM
• 

  Thank you for your help transcribing! We have recorded all your observations

  January 25, 2017 4:59 PM

Collections (0)